> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://jncia-workbook.gitbook.io/workbook/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://jncia-workbook.gitbook.io/workbook/junos-routing-policy/8-selective-redistribution-part-2.md).
# 8) Selective Redistribution (Part 2)
### Pre-Work
Load the config called **policy.cfg** using the **load\_config\_on\_nodes.py** script.
```
python3 load_config_on_nodes.py --lab_dir three-routers --config_filename policy.cfg
```
### Lab
Create a route-policy that redistributes static routes `10.0.1.0/24` and `10.2.0.0/16` into OSPF on R1. You are not allowed to use a `then` statement.
### Answer
Expand to reveal
```
edit policy-options policy-statement STATIC_TO_OSPF
set from protocol static
set from route-filter 10.0.1.0/24 exact accept
set from route-filter 10.2.0.0/16 exact accept
top
set protocols ospf export STATIC_TO_OSPF
```
### Explanation
Expand to reveal
This is a quick lab that tests your understanding of using `accept` or `reject` in-line on route-filters.
```
set from route-filter accept|reject
```
\
This allows you to create interesting one-term policies, such as a policy that accepts certain routes and rejects all others:
```
[edit]
admin@R1# show policy-options
policy-statement NAME {
from {
route-filter 10.0.0.0/8 exact accept;
}
then reject;
}
```
\
Note that since our route policy in this lab does not have a terminating action (`then accept` or `then reject`), all other routes not matching the two `route-filter` lines are then processed by the default OSPF export policy, which rejects all. The above example with a separate `then reject` might be used under BGP for example, where the default would otherwise be to advertise all BGP routes.
\
In general, I find it more readable and understandable to only include the action in a separate `then` statement, instead of in-line on the `route-filter`, but you need to be aware that this functionality is available as well.
\
We should see that only these two static routes are in the OSPF database:
```
[edit]
admin@R1# run show ospf database
OSPF database, Area 0.0.0.0
Type ID Adv Rtr Seq Age Opt Cksum Len
Router *10.0.0.1 10.0.0.1 0x80000004 6 0x22 0xc033 84
Router 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.2 0x80000002 24 0x22 0xfa0e 72
Summary 2.2.2.2 10.0.0.2 0x80000002 24 0x22 0xc463 28
OSPF AS SCOPE link state database
Type ID Adv Rtr Seq Age Opt Cksum Len
Extern *10.0.1.0 10.0.0.1 0x80000001 6 0x22 0x1389 36
Extern *10.2.0.0 10.0.0.1 0x80000001 6 0x22 0x695 36
```
### Further Reading